A Micro Level Investigation of Costs & Returns of Different Agro-ecosystems in Kashmir Region of Jammu and Kashmir: India

Main Article Content

Shabeer A. Ganaie
Arshad Bhat
Abid Qadir
Iqra Qureshi

Abstract

The basic objectives of the study were to enquire in to the involvement of various types of costs, the returns per rupee invested and the benefit thereof in different agro-ecosystems in the state of Jammu and Kashmir in general and valley of Kashmir in particular, especially the sampled districts.  This study was based upon primary and secondary data. A multi-stage random sampling was utilised for collection of date from 432 respondents of four different agro-ecological zones. For major crops, the cost of cultivation were estimated by concept utilised by Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP), Government of India. The results revealed that fruit crop agro-ecosystem is highly remunerative than field crop and crop agro-ecosystems, though the fruit crop involve huge of investment in terms of different costs. The livestock based agro-ecosystem is also dominant in some parts of the Kashmir region with declining trend. The results revealed that the gross returns of paddy and apple, livestock and cash crop were Rs. 23250, Rs. 321000, Rs. 108920 and 106915 respectively. This study had its applicability in the daily routine life of any household dwelling in the sampled agro-ecosystems. The study could be of utmost importance in selecting the crop in which the region/agro-ecosystem had specialisation or absolute advantage.

Keywords:
Livelihood, interdependence, costs, returns, agro-ecosystem.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ganaie, S. A., Bhat, A., Qadir, A., & Qureshi, I. (2020). A Micro Level Investigation of Costs & Returns of Different Agro-ecosystems in Kashmir Region of Jammu and Kashmir: India. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change, 10(1), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijecc/2020/v10i130175
Section
Original Research Article

References

Altieri MA. Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Westview Press, Inc., UK; 1995.

Augstburger HF, Jacobi J, Schwilch G, Rist S. Agroecosystem Service Capacity Index – A methodological approach. Landscape online. 2018;64:1-48.

Anonymous. Digest of Statistics, Planning and Development Department, Government of Jammu and Kashmir, Srinagar; 2008-09.

Kremen C, Iles A, Bacon C. Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society. 2012;17(4).

Ekbladh G, Grönlund E, Ingemarson F, Karlsson L, Nilsson S, Strid Eriksson I. Ecosystem properties and principles of living systems as foundation for sustainable agriculture – Critical reviews of environmental assessment tools, key findings and questions from a course process; 2002.

Singh J, Grover DK. Economics of wheat under different cropping systems. Progressive Farmer. 1992;28(6):23-26.

Regeena S. Smallholder livestock production in the home gardens of South Kerala: An economic analysis. proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference of Agricultural Economics Research Association on Livestock in Different Farming Systems, held at Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chennai. 2000;28.

Torane SR, Naik BK, Kulkarni VS, Talathi JM. Farming Systems Diversification in North Konkan Region of Maharashtra. An Economic Analysis. Agricultural Economics Research Review. 2011;24(1): 91-98.

Sati VP. Systems of agriculture farming in the Uttranchal Himalaya, India. Journal of Mountain Science. 2005;2(1): 76-85.

Nautiyal N. Agro-ecosystem analysis and carbon storage potential of central Himalayan rangelands: Pivoting on climate resilient strategies (Doctoral dissertation, GB Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar-263145 (Uttarakhand); 2013.

Radha Y, Raghu RP, Seetharaman S. Economics analysis of rice (HYV) based farming systems. Farming Systems. 1989; 5(1-2):18-22.