Assessment of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)-Chandrasur (Lepidium sativum L.) Intercropping Productivity Using Competitive Indices under Varying Moisture Regimes
Mahanand Sahu *
Department of Agronomy, RSV CARS, Bemetara IGKV, Raipur (C.G.), India.
U. K. Dhruw
Department of Agricultural Engineering, RSV CARS, Bemetara IGKV, Raipur (C.G.), India.
Sakshi Bajaj
Department of Agronomy, RSV CARS, Bemetara IGKV, Raipur (C.G.), India.
Hemlata Nirala
Department of Agronomy, RSV CARS, Bemetara IGKV, Raipur (C.G.), India.
Sanjeev Gurjar
Department of Agricultural Statistics, RSV CARS, Bemetara IGKV, Raipur (C.G.), India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
A two-season field investigation conducted at Raipur, Chhattisgarh, during the 2020–2021 and 2021–2022 rabi seasons examined chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and garden cress (Lepidium sativum L.) grown in replacement-series arrangements under three irrigation schedules. A split-plot design with three replications comprised no irrigation, irrigation at 35 days after sowing (DAS), and irrigation at 35 and 70 DAS as main-plot treatments, crossed with sole crops and 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 and 2:2 chickpea–garden cress row arrangements. Reported component seed-yield means were used to derive land equivalent ratios (LER), proportion-adjusted competitive ratios, aggressivity, relative crowding coefficients and actual yield loss indices. Across the two seasons, mean chickpea yield increased from 945.59 kg ha⁻¹ without irrigation to 1,347.15 kg ha⁻¹ with two irrigations. The 3:1 arrangement produced chickpea seed yields of 1,385.83 and 1,142.36 kg ha⁻¹ and garden cress yields of 420.73 and 570.74 kg ha⁻¹, respectively. Its LERs, obtained from treatment-mean yields, were 1.27 and 1.30. In contrast to interpretations based on unadjusted yield predominance, proportion-standardised competitive ratios for chickpea in the 3:1 arrangement were 0.83 and 0.62, indicating greater relative competitiveness of garden cress per unit sown share. The yield and index estimates suggest land-use complementarity, but the analyses of derived indices are descriptive because the replicate-level data required for uncertainty estimation were unavailable. Consequently, agronomic interpretations should be restricted to the seasons and environments studied.
Keywords: Chickpea, garden cress, replacement series, land equivalent ratio, competitive ratio, irrigation scheduling